Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 09:38 AM - General
Posted by Bryan Boyle
Ed Peters, noted canonist, noted on his blog:Posted by Bryan Boyle
==
For most of my life L’Osservatore Romano has been a sleepy Roman rag that arrived weeks after its publication date, printed in cheap ink that soiled the fingers of those who felt the need to read page after page of boilerplate remarks on the latest ambassador from anywhere shown in his tuxedo presenting diplomatic credentials. Aside, I suppose, from an occasionally interesting book review, L’OR has for decades carried nothing of serious interest that could not be found much more quickly in a half-dozen other venues, ones, moreover, that didn’t compel readers to wash their hands before handling anything beige or white.
But lately, L’OR has decided to become relevant. God help us.
Having just emerged, battered, but, I thought, moderately chastened after its embarrassingly naive and harmful editorial in praise of Pres. Obama, L’OR treats the world to a high-schoolish tribute to the highly talented and utterly pathetic entertainer Michael Jackson.
Jackson might not be fully responsible for the swirling chaos that was his life and death, but for L’OR even to mention his death – - without simultaneously urging Catholics to pray for his soul and the souls of all the faithful departed – - astounds me.
Worse, the L’OR report leaves Catholics little sense that much of Jackson’s work was sexually exploitative, at times quasi-obscene; it dismisses as insignificant the terrible example that Jackson’s chronic pursuit of superficial "beauty" gave to millions of young people; and, worst of all, it trivializes the serious, and in some cases unresolved, allegations of child sexual abuse made against him. L’OR need not assume the worst about Jackson’s conduct in these cases, but it should never have implied that such allegations, even if they are true, cannot tarnish the world-wide esteem in which he is held!
Good grief. Has L’OR completely lost its reason?
If the Vatican wants a newspaper to provide a Catholic perspective on the world, fine. Item Number One on the to-do list, though, should be to find Catholics who can write and edit such a paper coherently. Anyone can lurch from gaffe to gaffe.
In the meantime, if you really want to get in on the Jackson Praise Train, check out M-TV, dude. Their graphics are like way better than L’OR.
--
Ny own thoughts: I;m wondering whether or not l’O. R. has hired writers from Entertainment Tonight or any of the other MSM rags out there.
I was talking with a fellow from my rosary group yesterday about the wall-to-wall canonization of MJ.
Aside from the papering over of what are those ‘unresolved’ questions, one has to wonder why his whole sordid (and that’s what it is…sordid) life is being held up for public adulation.
My own opinion? So many people are so lost in a wilderness, believing in nothing, that they’ll fall for anything.
Pray for his soul? Of course. He was, after all, a child of God.
Hold him up as some sort of exemplary role model? Uh…I don’t think so. Everyone serves some purpose. His may be to serve as an example of unchecked greed, being used by others, a life lived without purpose, and the result of terrible abuse suffered at the hands of those who where charged with protecting and nourishing him.
That’s not going to stop the deification of MJ by the popular press and entertainment industries, though.




( 3.1 / 35 )


Calendar



